Farran Harrison, known professionally as 10Cellphones, a rapper from Charlotte, North Carolina, was arrested on December 28, 2024, on charges of possessing weapons of mass destruction. The arrest has garnered significant attention, raising questions about the nature of the charges and the legal implications for Harrison.

Details of the Arrest

Harrison was apprehended by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police following an investigation that led to the discovery of items classified under weapons of mass destruction. The specific items include:

• A Glock switch device, which is a device that can convert a semi-automatic firearm to fully automatic.
• A fuel filter firearm silencer, commonly known as a suppressor, designed to reduce the noise of gunfire.
• A cylindrical device used as a firearm silencer.

These items were found in Harrison’s possession, leading to the charges. AR15.com

Legal Implications

Under North Carolina law, the term “weapon of mass death and destruction” encompasses various items, including:

• Explosives or incendiaries.
• Weapons that can expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, with certain specifications.
• Firearms capable of fully automatic fire, certain shotguns, rifles, and mufflers or silencers.

The items found in Harrison’s possession fall under these definitions, leading to the charges against him.

Public Reaction

The arrest has sparked discussions on social media platforms, with many expressing surprise at the severity of the charges. Some users have questioned the classification of the items as weapons of mass destruction, suggesting that the term may be applied broadly in this context.

Next Steps

Harrison has been released on bond and is awaiting further legal proceedings. The case is ongoing, and more information may become available as the legal process unfolds.

Conclusion

The arrest of Farran Harrison, known as 10Cellphones, on charges of possessing weapons of mass destruction highlights the serious legal consequences associated with the possession of certain firearm accessories in North Carolina. As the case progresses, it will be important to monitor developments and understand the broader implications for firearm regulations in the state.

For more details on the case, visit this article.

Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates.