Protests erupted across Wisconsin as demonstrators voiced opposition to President Donald Trump’s recent executive actions and billionaire Elon Musk’s growing influence in government affairs. The protests, which culminated in a large gathering outside the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, reflected growing concerns over immigration policies, corporate favoritism, and transparency in government decision-making.

The demonstration, part of a nationwide movement, saw hundreds of activists carrying signs and chanting slogans denouncing Trump’s policies and Musk’s role in federal operations. Protesters called for greater accountability, emphasizing the need to protect civil rights and prevent corporate overreach in government affairs.

Trump’s Policies Spark Outrage

Many demonstrators focused their criticism on President Trump’s latest executive orders, particularly those related to immigration and social policy. Some of the most contentious policies include:

• Immigration Crackdowns: The administration’s renewed push for stricter immigration enforcement has led to concerns about family separations, deportations, and legal uncertainty for immigrants in the U.S.
• Project 2025: A highly controversial initiative that many view as a plan to restructure American government with hard-right policies, raising alarms among civil rights advocates.
• Restrictions on LGBTQ+ Rights: Recent measures aimed at rolling back protections for transgender individuals have sparked widespread condemnation from activists and lawmakers.

“These policies don’t reflect the values of our country,” said one protester in Madison. “We’re here to send a message that we won’t stand by while our rights are eroded.”

Similar protests took place in other major cities, including Philadelphia, Sacramento, and Austin, with thousands rallying against the administration’s decisions.

Elon Musk’s Role in Government Under Fire

Another major point of contention during the protests was the recent appointment of Elon Musk as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Critics argue that Musk’s role could present serious conflicts of interest, given his extensive business ventures in the technology, automotive, and space industries.

Protesters questioned whether Musk’s involvement in government decision-making would favor his own business interests, particularly in industries where his companies have contracts with federal agencies.

“Having someone like Musk in a position of power raises serious ethical concerns,” said a spokesperson for the protest group. “We need transparency, not more billionaires influencing policy behind closed doors.”

Concerns over Musk’s government access have already sparked a legislative response from House Democrats, who are pushing for new regulations to limit the influence of private individuals in federal operations.

House Democrats Introduce Bill Targeting Musk’s Influence

In response to growing concerns over Musk’s role, House Democrats have introduced legislation aimed at preventing unelected private individuals from gaining unrestricted access to government data and decision-making processes. The proposed bill would:

• Establish stricter oversight for individuals appointed to government roles without electoral or congressional approval.
• Limit access to classified information for corporate figures involved in federal policy discussions.
• Increase transparency requirements to ensure that government officials disclose their interactions with high-profile business leaders.

“This is about protecting democracy,” said a Democratic lawmaker backing the bill. “Government positions should serve the public interest, not private profit.”

The legislation is expected to face opposition from Republicans, who argue that Musk’s expertise in technology and innovation makes him a valuable asset to government decision-making. However, Democrats insist that corporate figures must be held to stricter ethical standards when engaging with federal agencies.

Nationwide Protests and Political Ramifications

The protests in Wisconsin and other states highlight the growing divide in American politics, with concerns over corporate influence and government transparency taking center stage. Activists are calling for more accountability and urging lawmakers to take action against what they see as unchecked power among elites.

As Trump’s administration continues to implement its policies, opposition from both grassroots movements and legislators is expected to intensify. The proposed legislation against Musk’s influence marks a significant step in addressing the broader debate over corporate involvement in government affairs.

For more updates on the protests and proposed legislation, visit AP News.