CHARLESTON, W.Va. – On Friday, Republican Ian Masters was officially sworn in as the newest member of the West Virginia House of Delegates, representing the 91st House District in southern Berkeley County. His appointment comes after a series of legal challenges and disputes that led to an unusual series of events surrounding the seat’s vacancy.
Masters’ swearing-in was not a straightforward process. It marked the first legislative appointment made by new Governor Patrick Morrisey, and the appointment itself came after a series of complicated actions, including a House Resolution, two contentious debates on the House floor, and intervention from the state’s highest court.
The controversy began back in November, when Joseph de Soto was initially elected to represent the 91st House District. At the time of his election, de Soto was a registered Republican, and House Republicans had actively recruited him to fill the seat. However, the situation quickly took a dark turn after de Soto’s arrest on December 12.
De Soto was taken into custody after allegedly making threatening statements about several of his fellow House members, including House Speaker Roger Hanshaw and new House Majority Leader Pat McGeehan. According to reports from the arresting officer, de Soto claimed he had a vision to “destroy them all” and said that “God called him to kill them.” His arrest shook the political community and raised questions about his fitness for office.
Adding to the drama, by the time of his arrest, de Soto had switched his political registration to Democrat. At the time of his removal from the House, he was still a registered Democrat and had been placed under court-ordered home confinement as he awaited trial.
The legal battle that followed his removal created significant uncertainty over who would fill the seat. With House Republicans holding a dominant majority in the state legislature, the Democratic Party’s objections were largely dismissed. However, the situation escalated when, on January 15, the West Virginia Democratic Party filed a petition with the state’s Supreme Court of Appeals, asking the court to ensure that the seat be filled by the party that held it at the time of vacancy. This legal action highlighted the party divide over how the 91st District seat should be filled.
Despite the Democratic Party’s petition, on January 23, Governor Morrisey announced the appointment of Ian Masters to the vacant seat. However, the Governor’s statement did not mention Masters’ affiliation with the Republican Party, which raised further questions about his understanding of the circumstances surrounding the vacancy. It remains unclear whether Morrisey was aware of the full details regarding de Soto’s removal and the legal challenges involved in the appointment process.
In response to the situation, Speaker Hanshaw filed an “automatic stay” on January 17 with the state’s Supreme Court of Appeals, effectively delaying their review of the matter for at least 30 days after the conclusion of the 2025 Legislative Session. Under West Virginia state law, such a stay is permitted and does not require a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The legal and political drama surrounding this case has sparked discussions about the process of filling vacant legislative seats, especially when the vacancy results from such a controversial and legally complicated situation. It also raises questions about the role of party affiliation and how political dynamics influence the appointment of public officials in the state.
For now, Masters has taken his oath of office, and the 91st House District is represented by a Republican once again. However, the legal uncertainties and political tensions surrounding this seat may continue to play out in the coming weeks. As Masters settles into his new role, it remains to be seen whether further legal challenges will arise or if the current state of affairs will hold.
This saga serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in the process of filling political vacancies, particularly in a state as politically divided as West Virginia. The appointment of Ian Masters, while final for now, has opened the door for ongoing debates about the balance of power in the state’s legislature and the influence of party politics in local governance.
In the coming months, all eyes will be on the state legislature to see how this case impacts future legislative decisions and whether the political landscape in West Virginia continues to shift under the weight of legal disputes and partisan battles.
Disclaimer – Our team has carefully fact-checked this article to make sure it’s accurate and free from any misinformation. We’re dedicated to keeping our content honest and reliable for our readers.
